Sammenlign metoder

	Systematisk litteraturgjennomgang assistert av VOSviewer	Vitenskapelig analyse – Kvantitativ studie av vitenskap
Fagfelt	Scientometri	Scientometri
Familie	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline
Opprinnelsesår	2010 (VOSviewer); practice established circa 2012–2015	1969 (term); 1963 (Price's foundational work)
Opphavsperson	van Eck & Waltman (VOSviewer tool); combined with Kitchenham SLR guidelines	V. V. Nalimov and Z. M. Mulchenko (term coined); Derek J. de Solla Price (foundational methods)
Type	Mixed bibliometric-qualitative review method	Quantitative literature analysis
Opprinnelig kilde	van Eck, N.J., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523–538.	Nalimov, V. V., & Mulchenko, Z. M. (1969). Naukometriya: Izucheniye razvitiya nauki kak informatsionnogo protsessa [Scientometrics: The Study of the Development of Science as an Information Process]. Nauka.
Alias	VOSviewer SLR, bibliometric-enhanced systematic review, VOSviewer-integrated review, visualization-assisted SLR	scientometrics, science of science, quantitative science studies, research evaluation analysis
Relaterte	6	6
Sammendrag	A VOSviewer-assisted systematic literature review combines the rigorous search-and-appraisal pipeline of a standard systematic review with bibliometric network visualization produced by the VOSviewer software. The approach allows researchers to systematically retrieve and screen the literature while simultaneously mapping co-citation clusters, keyword co-occurrence networks, and institutional collaboration patterns, yielding both a narrative synthesis and a visual, quantitative overview of the field's intellectual structure.	Scientometric analysis applies statistical and computational methods to publication and citation data to measure the growth, structure, and impact of scientific fields. Drawing on databases such as Web of Science, Scopus, or OpenAlex, it quantifies output trends, identifies leading authors and institutions, maps intellectual networks, and evaluates research impact — transforming large bibliographic corpora into evidence-based portraits of how knowledge develops and spreads.