Sammenlign metoder

	Transition Management	Multi-Level Perspective on Transitions
Fagfelt	Science Technology Studies	Science Technology Studies
Familie	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline
Opprinnelsesår	2001	2002
Opphavsperson	Jan Rotmans, René Kemp & Derk Loorbach	Frank W. Geels (building on Arie Rip and René Kemp)
Type	Prescriptive, complexity-based governance framework	Conceptual framework and analytic method for sociotechnical change
Opprinnelig kilde	Loorbach, D. (2010). Transition management for sustainable development: a prescriptive, complexity-based governance framework. Governance, 23(1), 161-183.	Geels, F. W. (2002). Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: a multi-level perspective and a case-study. Research Policy, 31(8-9), 1257-1274.
Alias	TM, Transition governance framework, Transition arena approach	MLP, Multi-level perspective framework, Sociotechnical transitions analysis
Relaterte	4	4
Sammendrag	Transition Management (TM) is a prescriptive, complexity-based governance framework for deliberately steering long-term, structural change in sociotechnical systems toward sustainability. Rather than predicting or controlling outcomes, it organises a cyclical, participatory process—strategic, tactical, operational, and reflexive activities—through which a small group of frontrunners develops shared long-term visions, translates them into agendas and coalitions, mobilises experiments, and continuously monitors and learns. It applies insights from transitions research to the question of how societies might govern their own transformations.	The Multi-Level Perspective (MLP) is a middle-range framework for analysing how large sociotechnical systems—energy, mobility, food, water—shift from one dominant configuration to another. It locates change in the interplay of three analytic levels: protected niches where radical novelties incubate, the incumbent sociotechnical regime that structures ordinary practice, and a slow-moving exogenous landscape. Transitions occur when landscape pressures destabilise the regime and open windows of opportunity for maturing niche innovations to break through.