Sammenlign metoder

	Tids-segmentert systematisk litteraturgjennomgang	Vitenskapskartlegging
Fagfelt	Scientometri	Bibliometri
Familie	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline
Opprinnelsesår	2010s	2000s
Opphavsperson	Adapted from systematic review methodology; temporal segmentation formalized in bibliometric practice (Zupic & Cater, 2015; Aria & Cuccurullo, 2017)	Katy Börner, Chaomei Chen, and others
Type	Systematic review variant with temporal segmentation	Method
Opprinnelig kilde	Zupic, I., & Cater, T. (2015). Bibliometric Methods in Management and Organization. Organizational Research Methods, 18(3), 429–472.	Börner, K., Chen, C., & Boyack, K. W. (2003). Visualizing knowledge domains. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 37, 179–255.
Alias	temporal systematic review, period-based systematic review, chronological systematic review, time-segmented literature review	knowledge mapping, domain mapping, research landscape visualization
Relaterte	5	5
Sammendrag	A time-sliced systematic literature review applies the rigorous search, screening, and synthesis protocol of a standard systematic review while dividing the retrieved corpus into discrete temporal periods — time slices — and analyzing each period separately. This design reveals how a research field has developed across time: which topics emerged, grew, or declined; how key authors and journals shifted; and how intellectual structures evolved from one era to the next.	Science mapping is a bibliometric visualization method that creates visual representations of research domains, showing the structure, development, and relationships of scientific fields. Using bibliographic data (citations, keywords, authors, journals), science mapping algorithms generate network diagrams where nodes represent documents, concepts, or authors and edges represent relationships (citation, collaboration, semantic similarity). The resulting maps make invisible intellectual structures visible, enabling researchers to understand field topology, identify emerging areas, and navigate disciplinary landscapes. Pioneered by Börner, Chen, and Boyack in the 2000s, science mapping has become a standard tool in research evaluation and strategic planning.