Sammenlign metoder

	Tematisk evolusjonsanalyse – Hvordan forskningstemaer endres over tid	Bibliometrisk analyse
Fagfelt	Scientometri	Scientometri
Familie	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline
Opprinnelsesår	2011	1969 (term coined); practice dates to 1920s–1930s
Opphavsperson	Manuel J. Cobo and colleagues (University of Granada)	Alan Pritchard (coined term); earlier quantitative work by Paul Otlet (1934) and S. C. Bradford (1934)
Type	Quantitative bibliometric technique	Quantitative literature analysis
Opprinnelig kilde	Cobo, M. J., Lopez-Herrera, A. G., Herrera-Viedma, E., & Herrera, F. (2011). Science mapping software tools: Review, analysis, and cooperative study among tools. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(7), 1382–1402.	Pritchard, A. (1969). Statistical bibliography or bibliometrics? Journal of Documentation, 25(4), 348–349.
Alias	TEA, thematic development analysis, temporal thematic mapping, longitudinal theme analysis	bibliometrics, bibliometric study, bibliometric mapping, publication analysis
Relaterte	6	6
Sammendrag	Thematic evolution analysis is a bibliometric technique that divides a body of literature into consecutive time periods and tracks how research themes emerge, consolidate, split, merge, or disappear across those periods. By combining co-word analysis, clustering, and strategic diagrams for each time slice, it produces a dynamic picture of a field's intellectual development rather than a static snapshot.	Bibliometric analysis applies statistical and mathematical methods to bibliographic records — publications, citations, authors, journals, and keywords — to measure and map the structure, output, and intellectual evolution of a research field. It is widely used to identify influential works, prolific authors, productive journals, collaboration networks, and emerging research themes across any academic discipline.