Sammenlign metoder
Gjennomgå de valgte metodene side om side; rader som avviker, er uthevet.
| Regulert gradient-boosting× | Boosting× | Gradient Boosting× | Regulert beslutningstre× | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fagfelt | Maskinlæring | Maskinlæring | Maskinlæring | Maskinlæring |
| Familie | Machine learning | Machine learning | Machine learning | Machine learning |
| Opprinnelsesår≠ | 2001 (gradient boosting); 2016 (explicit L1/L2 regularization in XGBoost) | 1990–1997 | 2001 | 1984 |
| Opphavsperson≠ | Chen, T. & Guestrin, C. (building on Friedman, J. H.) | Schapire, R. E.; Freund, Y. | Friedman, J. H. | Breiman, L., Friedman, J., Olshen, R., & Stone, C. |
| Type≠ | Regularized ensemble (additive tree model) | Sequential ensemble (iterative reweighting) | Ensemble (sequential boosting of decision trees) | Supervised learning (regularized tree) |
| Opprinnelig kilde≠ | Chen, T. & Guestrin, C. (2016). XGBoost: A scalable tree boosting system. Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, 785–794. DOI ↗ | Freund, Y. & Schapire, R. E. (1997). A decision-theoretic generalization of on-line learning and an application to boosting. Journal of Computer and System Sciences, 55(1), 119–139. DOI ↗ | Friedman, J. H. (2001). Greedy Function Approximation: A Gradient Boosting Machine. Annals of Statistics, 29(5), 1189–1232. DOI ↗ | Breiman, L., Friedman, J., Olshen, R., & Stone, C. (1984). Classification and Regression Trees. Wadsworth. ISBN: 978-0-412-04841-8 |
| Alias | penalized gradient boosting, shrinkage-regularized boosting, XGBoost-style regularization, L1/L2 gradient boosting | AdaBoost, gradient boosting, iterative reweighting ensemble, sequential ensemble | Gradient Boosting (GBM), GBM, gradient boosted trees, gradient boosting machine | pruned decision tree, cost-complexity pruned tree, penalized decision tree, constrained CART |
| Relaterte≠ | 6 | 6 | 5 | 6 |
| Sammendrag≠ | Regularized gradient boosting extends the classic additive tree ensemble (Friedman 2001) by embedding L1 and L2 penalty terms directly into the training objective, along with a complexity penalty on tree size. Popularized by XGBoost (Chen & Guestrin 2016), this framework reduces overfitting and improves generalization compared to unpenalized boosting, while retaining the method's characteristic accuracy on tabular data. | Boosting is a sequential ensemble technique that converts many simple, barely-better-than-chance learners into a single highly accurate model by repeatedly focusing training on the examples that previous learners got wrong, then combining all learners with weights proportional to their individual accuracy. | Gradient Boosting is an ensemble learning method, formalised by Jerome H. Friedman in 2001, that combines a sequence of weak learners — typically shallow decision trees — so that each new tree is fitted to minimise the residual errors of the trees before it. It is the core algorithm behind popular implementations such as XGBoost, LightGBM and CatBoost. | A regularized decision tree is a decision tree model whose complexity is intentionally limited through pruning, depth constraints, or penalty terms to prevent overfitting. Rooted in Breiman et al.'s CART framework (1984), regularization converts the greedy tree-growing procedure into a bias-variance tradeoff, yielding models that generalize better to unseen data than fully-grown trees. |
| ScholarGateDatasett ↗ |
|
|
|
|