Sammenlign metoder
Gjennomgå de valgte metodene side om side; rader som avviker, er uthevet.
| Rapid Assessment Instrument× | Single-System Design× | |
|---|---|---|
| Fagfelt | Social Work | Social Work |
| Familie | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Opprinnelsesår≠ | 2002 | 2009 |
| Opphavsperson≠ | Walter W. Hudson and the clinical-measurement tradition; codified by Springer, Abell & Hudson | Martin Bloom, Joel Fischer & John G. Orme (codification in social work) |
| Type≠ | Brief, standardized, self-report measure for repeated use in practice | Time-series design for evaluating intervention with a single client system |
| Opprinnelig kilde≠ | Springer, D. W., Abell, N., & Hudson, W. W. (2002). Creating and validating rapid assessment instruments for practice and research: Part 1. Research on Social Work Practice, 12(3), 408–439. DOI ↗ | Bloom, M., Fischer, J., & Orme, J. G. (2009). Evaluating Practice: Guidelines for the Accountable Professional (6th ed.). Pearson/Allyn & Bacon. ISBN: 9780205458066 |
| Alias | RAI, Rapid Assessment Instruments, Brief Standardized Self-Report Scale, Clinical Measurement Package Scales | Single-Subject Design, Single-Case Design, N-of-1 Design, Single-System Evaluation |
| Relaterte | 4 | 4 |
| Sammendrag≠ | A rapid assessment instrument (RAI) is a short, standardized, self-report measure designed to be completed quickly and repeatedly so that a social worker can assess the magnitude of a client's problem, compare it against a validated clinical cutoff, and monitor change over the course of an intervention. The format was championed by Walter Hudson, whose Clinical Measurement Package scales set the template, and was systematized for practitioners by Springer, Abell, and Hudson, who laid out how to create and validate such instruments for practice and research. | A single-system design is a time-series approach to evaluating practice in which a single client system — an individual, family, group, or organization — is measured repeatedly on a clearly defined target before and during (and sometimes after) an intervention. By tracking the same system over time rather than comparing a treatment group to a control group, it lets a practitioner judge whether their own intervention is associated with change in the people they actually serve. It is the methodological backbone of the 'accountable professional' tradition codified by Bloom, Fischer, and Orme. |
| ScholarGateDatasett ↗ |
|
|