Sammenlign metoder

	Kvalitativt-dominant intervensjons blandet metode-design	Partisiperende Intervensjons Blandede Metoder
Fagfelt	Forskningsdesign	Forskningsdesign
Familie	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline
Opprinnelsesår	2000s–2010s	1990s–2000s (formalized as mixed methods variant ~2000–2010)
Opphavsperson	Creswell & Plano Clark; Teddlie & Tashakkori	Donna Mertens; John Creswell & Vicki Plano Clark (mixed methods traditions); community-based participatory research scholars
Type	Mixed methods research design	Mixed methods research design
Opprinnelig kilde	Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications. ISBN: 978-1483344379	Mertens, D. M. (2009). Transformative Research and Evaluation. Guilford Press. ISBN: 978-1606230077
Alias	qual-dominant intervention MMR, qualitatively driven intervention design, QUAL+quan intervention design, qualitative-priority intervention mixed methods	PIMM, participatory mixed methods intervention, community-based intervention mixed methods, action-oriented mixed methods design
Relaterte	6	2
Sammendrag	Qualitative-dominant intervention mixed methods is a research design in which qualitative inquiry carries primary theoretical and interpretive weight while quantitative data provide supplementary evidence, both strands applied within an intervention or program context. The design is used when understanding the lived experience of participants, the mechanisms of an intervention, and the meaning-making around change are more central to the research purpose than measuring effect sizes alone.	Participatory Intervention Mixed Methods (PIMM) is a research design that embeds community members as co-investigators in the planning and delivery of an intervention, while collecting and integrating both quantitative outcome data and qualitative experiential data. The design bridges participatory action research traditions with the rigor of mixed methods, enabling researchers to simultaneously measure whether an intervention works and understand how and why it works from participants' own perspectives.