Sammenlign metoder
Gjennomgå de valgte metodene side om side; rader som avviker, er uthevet.
| Deltakende multippel casestudie× | Deltakende enkeltkasusstudie× | |
|---|---|---|
| Fagfelt | Kvalitativ | Kvalitativ |
| Familie | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Opprinnelsesår≠ | 1980s–1990s (convergence of case study methodology and participatory research traditions) | Emerged as a distinct variant in the 1990s–2000s |
| Opphavsperson≠ | Robert K. Yin (multiple case study logic); Kurt Lewin and subsequent PAR scholars (participatory framework) | Draws on Robert K. Yin (case study methodology) and Kurt Lewin / Orlando Fals-Borda (participatory research tradition) |
| Type≠ | Qualitative research design | Qualitative case study design with participatory orientation |
| Opprinnelig kilde | Yin, R. K. (2018). Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods (6th ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-1506336169 | Yin, R. K. (2018). Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods (6th ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-1506336169 |
| Alias | participatory multi-case study, collaborative multiple case study, PMCS, participatory comparative case research | participatory case study, collaborative single case study, community-engaged case study, PSCS |
| Relaterte | 5 | 5 |
| Sammendrag≠ | Participatory multiple case study research integrates the structured logic of multiple case study design — examining two or more bounded cases to build analytic generalisations — with the collaborative ethics of participatory research, where community members or practitioners co-design the inquiry, co-collect data, and co-interpret findings. The approach combines Yin's replication logic across cases with the emancipatory and co-ownership principles that define participatory action research traditions. | A participatory single case study is a qualitative design that examines one bounded case in depth while actively involving community members, practitioners, or participants as co-researchers throughout the inquiry. It blends Yin's case study rigor — triangulated evidence, thick description of context — with participatory action research values of collaboration, equity, and action. The result is both a rich, contextual understanding of the case and a knowledge-building process that serves the people within it. |
| ScholarGateDatasett ↗ |
|
|