ScholarGate
Assistent

Sammenlign metoder

Gjennomgå de valgte metodene side om side; rader som avviker, er uthevet.

Nettverksbasert vitenskapsmetrisk analyse×Co-sitingsanalyse×
FagfeltScientometriBibliometri
FamilieProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Opprinnelsesår1965 (Price); computational refinement 2000s–2010s1973
OpphavspersonDerek J. de Solla Price (network citation structure); Nees Jan van Eck & Ludo Waltman (computational network mapping)Henry Small
TypeQuantitative bibliometric methodMethod
Opprinnelig kildevan Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523–538. DOI ↗Small, H. (1973). Co-citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 24(4), 265–269. DOI ↗
Aliasscientometric network analysis, bibliometric network analysis, citation network scientometrics, science network mappingco-citation mapping, historiograph, direct citation, citation pair analysis
Relaterte65
SammendragNetwork-based scientometric analysis applies graph-theoretic methods to bibliographic data — publications, citations, authors, and keywords — to map the intellectual structure of a scientific field. By modeling documents or authors as nodes and their relationships (citations, co-authorships, co-word occurrences) as edges, it reveals clusters of knowledge, central actors, emerging topics, and the flow of ideas across disciplines. Tools such as VOSviewer, Gephi, and the R package bibliometrix are commonly used.Co-citation analysis is a method that identifies the intellectual structure of a research domain by examining how frequently pairs of documents are cited together in other publications. When two papers are frequently cited together in the literature, they are considered co-cited, indicating they are conceptually related or influential within the same research community. Developed by Henry Small in 1973, co-citation analysis maps the 'invisible colleges' of science—networks of researchers working on related problems—and reveals how knowledge domains evolve over time.
ScholarGateDatasett
  1. v1
  2. 2 Kilder
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Kilder
  3. PUBLISHED

Gå til søk Last ned lysbilder

ScholarGateSammenlign metoder: Network-based Scientometric analysis · Co-Citation Analysis. Hentet 2026-06-17 fra https://scholargate.app/no/compare