Sammenlign metoder

	Nettverksbasert kartleggingsoversikt	Co-sitingsanalyse
Fagfelt	Scientometri	Bibliometri
Familie	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline
Opprinnelsesår	2000s–2010s	1973
Opphavsperson	Petticrew & Roberts (mapping review); network overlay adopted from bibliometric network analysis tradition	Henry Small
Type	Evidence synthesis method with network analysis overlay	Method
Opprinnelig kilde	Petticrew, M., & Roberts, H. (2006). Systematic Reviews in the Social Sciences: A Practical Guide. Blackwell Publishing. ISBN: 978-1405121101	Small, H. (1973). Co-citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 24(4), 265–269.
Alias	network mapping review, citation-network mapping review, network-enhanced evidence mapping, network-informed mapping review	co-citation mapping, historiograph, direct citation, citation pair analysis
Relaterte	6	5
Sammendrag	A network-based mapping review combines the breadth of a traditional evidence mapping exercise with bibliometric network analysis to chart the structural landscape of a research field. Rather than simply cataloguing studies by topic, this approach constructs citation, co-authorship, or co-word networks to reveal clusters of intellectual activity, influential works, and collaboration patterns — producing both a visual and a descriptive map of the evidence base.	Co-citation analysis is a method that identifies the intellectual structure of a research domain by examining how frequently pairs of documents are cited together in other publications. When two papers are frequently cited together in the literature, they are considered co-cited, indicating they are conceptually related or influential within the same research community. Developed by Henry Small in 1973, co-citation analysis maps the 'invisible colleges' of science—networks of researchers working on related problems—and reveals how knowledge domains evolve over time.