Sammenlign metoder

	Ny tilnærming til upresisjon i vurdering og beslutningsmiljøer	Analytic Hierarchy Process	Best-Worst Method
Fagfelt	Beslutningstaking	Beslutningstaking	Beslutningstaking
Familie	MCDM	MCDM	MCDM
Opprinnelsesår	1995	1980	2015
Opphavsperson	Munda, G.	Saaty, T. L.	Rezaei, J.
Type	Fuzzy pairwise equity/inequality comparison (semantic distance)	Pairwise comparison (eigenvalue)	Pairwise comparison (best-to-others + others-to-worst vectors), LP
Opprinnelig kilde	Munda, G. (1995). Multicriteria Evaluation in a Fuzzy Environment: Theory and Applications in Ecological Economics. Physica-Verlag, Heidelberg	Saaty, T. L. (1980). The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation. McGraw-Hill, New York ISBN: 978-0070543713	Rezaei, J. (2015). Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method. Omega
Alias	—	—	—
Relaterte	8	8	8
Sammendrag	NAIADE (Novel Approach to Imprecise Assessment and Decision Environments) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Munda, G. in 1995. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.	AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process) is a weight subjective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Saaty, T. L. in 1980. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.	BWM (Best-Worst Method) is a weight subjective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Rezaei, J. in 2015. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.