Sammenlign metoder
Gjennomgå de valgte metodene side om side; rader som avviker, er uthevet.
| Neutrosophisk utvidelse av TOPSIS× | CRiteria Importance Through Intercriteria Correlation× | |
|---|---|---|
| Fagfelt | Beslutningstaking | Beslutningstaking |
| Familie | MCDM | MCDM |
| Opprinnelsesår≠ | 2016 | 1995 |
| Opphavsperson≠ | Biswas, P., Pramanik, S., Giri, B. C. | Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L. |
| Type≠ | Neutrosophic outranking/ranking — Single-Valued Neutrosophic Set (SVNS: T, I, F; T,I,F ∈ [0,1], T+I+F ≤ 3) | Statistical contrast intensity + correlation-based objective weighting |
| Opprinnelig kilde≠ | Biswas, P., Pramanik, S., Giri, B. C. (2016). TOPSIS method for multi-attribute group decision-making under single-valued neutrosophic environment. Neural Computing and Applications DOI ↗ | Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L. (1995). Determining objective weights in multiple criteria problems: The CRITIC method. Computers & Operations Research DOI ↗ |
| Alias | — | — |
| Relaterte | 8 | 8 |
| Sammendrag≠ | N-TOPSIS (Neutrosophic extension of TOPSIS) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Biswas, P., Pramanik, S., Giri, B. C. in 2016. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. | CRITIC (CRiteria Importance Through Intercriteria Correlation) is a weight objective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L. in 1995. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. |
| ScholarGateDatasett ↗ |
|
|