Sammenlign metoder
Gjennomgå de valgte metodene side om side; rader som avviker, er uthevet.
| COPRAS-IN× | Kompleks proporsjonal vurdering× | |
|---|---|---|
| Fagfelt | Beslutningstaking | Beslutningstaking |
| Familie | MCDM | MCDM |
| Opprinnelsesår≠ | 2019 | 1996 |
| Opphavsperson≠ | Şahin, R. | Zavadskas, E. K., Kaklauskas, A. |
| Type≠ | Interval Neutrosophic ranking — INN: <[T_L,T_U],[I_L,I_U],[F_L,F_U]> with 0 ≤ T_U+I_U+F_U ≤ 3 | Proportional assessment (benefit/cost split) |
| Opprinnelig kilde≠ | Şahin, R. (2019). COPRAS Method with Neutrosophic Sets. Fuzzy Multi-criteria Decision-Making Using Neutrosophic Sets, Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing, vol 369, Springer, Cham DOI ↗ | Zavadskas, E. K., Kaklauskas, A. (1996). Determination of an Efficient Contractor by Using the New Method of Multicriteria Assessment. International Symposium for The Organization and Management of Construction. Shaping Theory and Practice. Vol. 2: Managing the Construction Project and Managing Risk. CIB W 65 link ↗ |
| Alias | — | — |
| Relaterte≠ | 7 | 8 |
| Sammendrag≠ | N-COPRAS (COPRAS-IN — COPRAS with Interval Neutrosophic Numbers (INN)) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Şahin, R. in 2019. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. | COPRAS (Complex Proportional Assessment) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Zavadskas, E. K., Kaklauskas, A. in 1996. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. |
| ScholarGateDatasett ↗ |
|
|