Sammenlign metoder
Gjennomgå de valgte metodene side om side; rader som avviker, er uthevet.
| Multippel kasusbasert narrativ metode× | Fler-case studie× | |
|---|---|---|
| Fagfelt | Kvalitativ | Kvalitativ |
| Familie | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Opprinnelsesår≠ | 2000s (synthesis of Clandinin & Connelly 2000 with multiple case study design) | 1980s–1990s (Yin's first edition 1984; Stake's collective case study concept 1995) |
| Opphavsperson≠ | D. Jean Clandinin & F. Michael Connelly (narrative inquiry); Robert K. Yin (multiple case logic) | Robert K. Yin (systematic replication logic); Robert E. Stake (naturalistic/collective case tradition) |
| Type≠ | Qualitative research design | Qualitative research method |
| Opprinnelig kilde≠ | Clandinin, D. J., & Connelly, F. M. (2000). Narrative inquiry: Experience and story in qualitative research. Jossey-Bass. ISBN: 978-0787943523 | Yin, R. K. (2018). Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods (6th ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-1506336169 |
| Alias | multi-case narrative inquiry, cross-case narrative research, comparative narrative inquiry, multi-site narrative inquiry | comparative case study, multi-site case study, collective case study, cross-case analysis |
| Relaterte≠ | 5 | 6 |
| Sammendrag≠ | Multiple case-based narrative inquiry is a qualitative research design that applies narrative inquiry — the study of human experience through story — across two or more purposively selected cases. Each case is treated as a bounded narrative unit, enabling both within-case depth and cross-case comparison. The approach draws on Clandinin and Connelly's narrative inquiry tradition while adopting the replication logic of multiple case design to build richer, more transferable understandings of how people narrate and make meaning of their experiences. | Multiple-case study design investigates two or more bounded real-world cases using the same research protocol, then compares findings across cases to identify patterns, contrasts, and explanatory insights that a single case could not produce. Developed primarily through Robert Yin's replication logic and Robert Stake's collective case tradition, the approach is particularly powerful when a researcher needs to determine whether a phenomenon occurs under varied conditions or to test an emerging theoretical explanation against rival contexts. |
| ScholarGateDatasett ↗ |
|
|