Sammenlign metoder

	Multisaksbasert kritisk diskursanalyse	Tematisk analyse
Fagfelt	Kvalitativ	Kvalitativ forskning
Familie	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline
Opprinnelsesår	1990s–2000s (CDA foundations ~1989–1995; multiple case integration in applied discourse research)	2006
Opphavsperson	Norman Fairclough (CDA); Robert K. Yin (multiple case design)	Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke
Type	Qualitative research design and analytic method	Method
Opprinnelig kilde	Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language. Longman. ISBN: 978-0582219526	Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.
Alias	multi-case CDA, comparative critical discourse analysis, cross-case CDA, multiple case CDA	TA, Reflexive Thematic Analysis
Relaterte	5	3
Sammendrag	Multiple case-based critical discourse analysis (multi-case CDA) combines the comparative logic of multiple case study design with the ideological and power-focused analytic apparatus of critical discourse analysis. The researcher selects two or more purposefully chosen cases, collects relevant texts or spoken discourse within each, applies CDA to reveal how language constructs power relations and ideologies within each case, and then synthesises findings across cases to identify patterns, contrasts, and broader sociocritical insights that a single-case design could not yield.	Thematic Analysis (TA) is a qualitative research methodology for identifying, analyzing, and reporting patterns (themes) in qualitative data. Developed systematically by Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke (2006), TA is flexible and accessible, applicable across diverse theoretical frameworks and data types, making it one of the most widely used qualitative methods in psychology, health research, and social sciences.