Sammenlign metoder
Gjennomgå de valgte metodene side om side; rader som avviker, er uthevet.
| Flerrespons feilmodus- og effektanalyse (MR-FMEA)× | Kvalitetsfunksjonsutvikling× | |
|---|---|---|
| Fagfelt | Forsøksdesign | Forsøksdesign |
| Familie | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Opprinnelsesår≠ | 1990s–2000s | 1966 (Japan); popularised in the West ~1988 |
| Opphavsperson≠ | Extended from classical FMEA (MIL-P-1629, 1949; Ford Motor Company, 1970s); multi-response integration developed in quality engineering literature from the 1990s onward | Yoji Akao |
| Type≠ | Risk analysis and quality engineering method | Structured quality planning and product design method |
| Opprinnelig kilde≠ | Stamatis, D. H. (2003). Failure Mode and Effect Analysis: FMEA from Theory to Execution (2nd ed.). ASQ Quality Press. ISBN: 978-0873895989 | Akao, Y. (Ed.). (1990). Quality Function Deployment: Integrating Customer Requirements into Product Design. Productivity Press. ISBN: 978-0915299416 |
| Alias | MR-FMEA, multi-response FMEA, multi-criteria FMEA, multi-objective FMEA | QFD, House of Quality, customer-driven engineering, voice of the customer matrix |
| Relaterte≠ | 6 | 4 |
| Sammendrag≠ | Multi-response FMEA extends classical Failure Mode and Effects Analysis to systems or processes where each failure mode produces effects across multiple quality characteristics or response variables simultaneously. Rather than assigning a single Risk Priority Number (RPN), it evaluates severity, occurrence, and detectability for each response dimension, then integrates these ratings — often via multi-criteria scoring or weighted aggregation — to obtain a holistic risk ranking that captures the full consequence profile of each failure mode. | Quality Function Deployment (QFD) is a structured method for translating customer needs — the voice of the customer — into specific technical requirements at every stage of product or service development. Originating in Japan in the 1960s, QFD uses a matrix-based tool called the House of Quality to make customer priorities visible, link them to engineering parameters, expose trade-offs, and maintain focus on what customers actually value throughout the design process. |
| ScholarGateDatasett ↗ |
|
|