Sammenlign metoder
Gjennomgå de valgte metodene side om side; rader som avviker, er uthevet.
| Flernivå typisk sak-utvalg× | Formålsrettet utvalg× | |
|---|---|---|
| Fagfelt | Surveymetodikk | Surveymetodikk |
| Familie | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Opprinnelsesår≠ | 1990s–2000s | Formalized ~1980–1990 |
| Opphavsperson≠ | Draws on Patton (typical case sampling) and multilevel research traditions (Hox, Raudenbush) | Michael Quinn Patton (systematic articulation); roots in early qualitative inquiry |
| Type≠ | Purposive sampling strategy | Non-probability sampling strategy |
| Opprinnelig kilde≠ | Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods (3rd ed.). Sage Publications. ISBN: 978-0761919711 | Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods (2nd ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-0803937796 |
| Alias≠ | multilevel typical case selection, hierarchical typical case sampling, nested typical case sampling | judgmental sampling, selective sampling, criterion-based sampling, purposeful sampling |
| Relaterte≠ | 6 | 4 |
| Sammendrag≠ | Multi-level typical case sampling is a purposive strategy that selects representative, average-profile units at each level of a hierarchical structure — for example, typical classrooms within typical schools, or typical employees within typical departments. It is used when the research goal is to describe or illustrate the ordinary functioning of a nested phenomenon rather than to capture its extremes or full variation. | Purposive sampling is a non-probability strategy in which the researcher deliberately selects participants, documents, or cases that are information-rich with respect to the research question. Rather than drawing units at random, the researcher applies explicit criteria aligned with the study's purpose, maximising the depth and relevance of the data collected. It is the default sampling logic in most qualitative research designs and is also used in mixed-methods and applied evaluative work. |
| ScholarGateDatasett ↗ |
|
|