ScholarGate
Assistent

Sammenlign metoder

Gjennomgå de valgte metodene side om side; rader som avviker, er uthevet.

Bibliometriske lover: Lotkas, Bradfords og Zipfs lover×Co-sitingsanalyse×
FagfeltBibliometriBibliometri
FamilieProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Opprinnelsesår1926–19491973
OpphavspersonAlfred J. Lotka, Samuel C. Bradford, George K. ZipfHenry Small
TypeConceptMethod
Opprinnelig kildeLotka, A. J. (1926). The frequency distribution of scientific productivity. Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences, 16(12), 317–323. link ↗Small, H. (1973). Co-citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 24(4), 265–269. DOI ↗
Aliasbibliometric distributions, productivity laws, frequency laws, information science lawsco-citation mapping, historiograph, direct citation, citation pair analysis
Relaterte35
SammendragThree foundational empirical laws describe the structure and distribution of scientific information: Lotka's Law characterizes author productivity (most authors publish few papers; a few publish many), Bradford's Law describes journal concentration (a small number of core journals contain the majority of papers on a topic), and Zipf's Law models word and term frequency (word frequency inversely proportional to its rank). These regularities, discovered in the mid-20th century, are remarkably robust across disciplines and have become essential tools for understanding research productivity, organizing information resources, and designing search strategies.Co-citation analysis is a method that identifies the intellectual structure of a research domain by examining how frequently pairs of documents are cited together in other publications. When two papers are frequently cited together in the literature, they are considered co-cited, indicating they are conceptually related or influential within the same research community. Developed by Henry Small in 1973, co-citation analysis maps the 'invisible colleges' of science—networks of researchers working on related problems—and reveals how knowledge domains evolve over time.
ScholarGateDatasett
  1. v1
  2. 3 Kilder
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Kilder
  3. PUBLISHED

Gå til søk Last ned lysbilder

ScholarGateSammenlign metoder: Bibliometric Laws: Lotka, Bradford, Zipf · Co-Citation Analysis. Hentet 2026-06-20 fra https://scholargate.app/no/compare