Sammenlign metoder
Gjennomgå de valgte metodene side om side; rader som avviker, er uthevet.
| Interpretiv metaforanalyse× | Fortolkende innholdsanalyse× | |
|---|---|---|
| Fagfelt | Kvalitativ | Kvalitativ |
| Familie | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Opprinnelsesår≠ | 1980 (conceptual foundations); 2000s (systematic qualitative procedure) | 1983 (Mayring's German original); 2000 (English publication) |
| Opphavsperson≠ | Rudolf Schmitt (systematic procedure); grounded in Lakoff & Johnson's conceptual metaphor theory | Philipp Mayring (systematic qualitative variant); Klaus Krippendorff (foundational framework) |
| Type≠ | Qualitative interpretive analysis | Qualitative text analysis approach |
| Opprinnelig kilde≠ | Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors We Live By. University of Chicago Press. ISBN: 978-0226468013 | Mayring, P. (2000). Qualitative content analysis. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 1(2), Art. 20. link ↗ |
| Alias | IMA, hermeneutic metaphor analysis, qualitative metaphor analysis, interpretive conceptual metaphor analysis | ICA, interpretive CA, qualitative content analysis, meaning-oriented content analysis |
| Relaterte | 6 | 6 |
| Sammendrag≠ | Interpretive metaphor analysis is a qualitative method that systematically identifies and interprets the conceptual metaphors embedded in participants' language to understand how they make meaning of their experiences. Rooted in Lakoff and Johnson's conceptual metaphor theory and adapted for empirical social research by Rudolf Schmitt, it applies a hermeneutic lens to treat metaphors not as stylistic ornaments but as windows into underlying cognitive and cultural frames. | Interpretive content analysis is a systematic qualitative approach for analyzing the latent meanings and interpretive frameworks embedded in textual, visual, or documentary data. Unlike frequency-based content analysis, it foregrounds the researcher's interpretive engagement with texts to uncover how meaning is constructed, contested, or reproduced. Philipp Mayring's qualitative content analysis and broader interpretive traditions provide the methodological backbone for this approach. |
| ScholarGateDatasett ↗ |
|
|