ScholarGate
Assistent

Sammenlign metoder

Gjennomgå de valgte metodene side om side; rader som avviker, er uthevet.

Indexing Consistency Analysis×Query Log Analysis×
FagfeltLibrary Information ScienceLibrary Information Science
FamilieProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Opprinnelsesår19812000
OpphavspersonL. Rolling; Pranas Zunde & Margaret Dexter (indexing-evaluation tradition)Bernard J. Jansen, Amanda Spink & Tefko Saracevic; Silverstein et al.
TypeDiagnostic analysis of indexing variability and its retrieval consequencesTransaction-log analysis pipeline for search behavior
Opprinnelig kildeRolling, L. (1981). Indexing consistency, quality and efficiency. Information Processing & Management, 17(2), 69-76. DOI ↗Jansen, B. J., Spink, A., & Saracevic, T. (2000). Real life, real users, and real needs: a study and analysis of user queries on the web. Information Processing & Management, 36(2), 207-227. DOI ↗
AliasIndexing Variability Analysis, Indexing Reliability Analysis, Indexing Consistency Study, Within- and Between-Indexer Consistency AnalysisTransaction Log Analysis, Search Log Analysis, Web Query Log Analysis, Query Transaction Analysis
Relaterte33
SammendragIndexing consistency analysis goes beyond reporting a single agreement number to diagnose why indexing varies and what that variability costs. It distinguishes between-indexer consistency (do different people agree?) from within-indexer consistency (does the same person agree with themselves on re-indexing?), models how factors such as indexing exhaustivity, vocabulary specificity, document subject, and indexer experience drive the variability, and — following Rolling's question of whether consistency stands in for quality — traces how inconsistency degrades retrieval. The aim is actionable: identify the terms, subjects, and conditions where indexers diverge most, and feed that back into guidelines, vocabulary design, and training.Query log analysis — also called transaction-log analysis — studies the records that search systems automatically keep of what users typed, what they clicked, and when. Rather than asking users what they do or testing systems in the laboratory, it observes millions of real searches as they actually happened. The landmark studies by Jansen, Spink, and Saracevic on the Excite engine and by Silverstein and colleagues on AltaVista revealed a consistent and surprising picture: real web queries are very short, rarely use advanced operators, and users almost never look past the first page of results. By cleaning logs, reconstructing sessions, and tabulating term, query, and session statistics, the method turns raw server records into a behavioral portrait of how people really search.
ScholarGateDatasett
  1. v1
  2. 3 Kilder
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 Kilder
  3. PUBLISHED

Gå til søk Last ned lysbilder

ScholarGateSammenlign metoder: Indexing Consistency Analysis · Query Log Analysis. Hentet 2026-06-24 fra https://scholargate.app/no/compare