Sammenlign metoder

	Dybdeintervju som metode	Refleksivitet i kvalitativ forskning
Fagfelt	Kvalitativ forskning	Kvalitativ forskning
Familie	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline
Opprinnelsesår	1954	1990
Opphavsperson	Carl Rogers and Herbert H. Hyman	Anthony Giddens and Pierre Bourdieu
Type	Method	Concept
Opprinnelig kilde	Kvale, S. (1996). InterViews: An Introduction to Qualitative Research Interviewing. SAGE Publications. ISBN: 978-0761908631	Finlay, L. (2002). Outing the researcher: The provenance, process, and practice of reflexivity. Qualitative Health Research, 12(4), 531-545.
Alias	IDI, qualitative interview, one-on-one interview, in-depth interviewing	reflexive practice, researcher reflexivity, positionality, reflective practice
Relaterte	5	4
Sammendrag	In-depth interviews are a qualitative research method in which a trained interviewer conducts one-on-one conversations with individual participants using open-ended questions to explore their experiences, perspectives, and understandings of a phenomenon. Developed in the 1950s by Rogers and Hyman, the method varies along a spectrum from structured (standardized question sets) to semi-structured (guided topic areas with flexibility) to unstructured (emergent, conversational). In-depth interviews are widely used in sociology, psychology, health sciences, anthropology, and organizational research to capture rich, detailed narratives and personal meaning.	Reflexivity is the practice of examining how the researcher's identity, assumptions, relationships, and values influence the research process and findings. Rather than treating objectivity as achievable detachment, reflexivity acknowledges that the researcher is embedded within the research and cannot be fully separated from it. Originating in sociology and anthropology, reflexivity has become central to qualitative research rigor across disciplines. Reflexive researchers critically examine their own influence at each stage: research design, participant recruitment, data collection, interpretation, and presentation. This transparency strengthens rigor by making visible the lens through which data are collected and interpreted.