ScholarGate
Assistent

Sammenlign metoder

Gjennomgå de valgte metodene side om side; rader som avviker, er uthevet.

Integrert bestemmelse av objektive kriterievekter×Vurdering av additivt forhold×
FagfeltBeslutningstakingBeslutningstaking
FamilieMCDMMCDM
Opprinnelsesår20122010
OpphavspersonZavadskas, E. K., Podvezko, V.Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z.
TypeIntegrated objective weighting (ENTROPY × CILOS product-normalisation)Additive utility ratio (optimal reference row)
Opprinnelig kildeZavadskas, E. K., Podvezko, V. (2012). Integrated Determination of Objective Criteria Weights in MCDM. International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making link ↗Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z. (2010). A new additive ratio assessment (ARAS) method in multicriteria decision-making. Technological and Economic Development of Economy link ↗
Alias
Relaterte88
SammendragIDOCRIW (Integrated Determination of Objective CRIteria Weights) is a weight objective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Zavadskas, E. K., Podvezko, V. in 2012. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.ARAS (Additive Ratio Assessment) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z. in 2010. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.
ScholarGateDatasett
  1. v1
  2. 1 Kilder
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 Kilder
  3. PUBLISHED

Gå til søk Last ned lysbilder

ScholarGateSammenlign metoder: IDOCRIW · ARAS. Hentet 2026-06-18 fra https://scholargate.app/no/compare