Sammenlign metoder
Gjennomgå de valgte metodene side om side; rader som avviker, er uthevet.
| Feltbasert teoretisk sampling× | Formålsrettet utvalg× | |
|---|---|---|
| Fagfelt | Surveymetodikk | Surveymetodikk |
| Familie | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Opprinnelsesår≠ | 1967 | Formalized ~1980–1990 |
| Opphavsperson≠ | Barney G. Glaser and Anselm L. Strauss | Michael Quinn Patton (systematic articulation); roots in early qualitative inquiry |
| Type≠ | Qualitative iterative sampling strategy | Non-probability sampling strategy |
| Opprinnelig kilde≠ | Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Aldine. ISBN: 978-0202302607 | Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods (2nd ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-0803937796 |
| Alias | field theoretical sampling, in-situ theoretical sampling, fieldwork-driven theoretical sampling, grounded field sampling | judgmental sampling, selective sampling, criterion-based sampling, purposeful sampling |
| Relaterte≠ | 3 | 4 |
| Sammendrag≠ | Field-based theoretical sampling is an iterative qualitative sampling strategy in which decisions about whom to observe or interview next are made during active fieldwork, guided by emerging theoretical insights from the data already collected. Rooted in Glaser and Strauss's grounded theory, it extends theoretical sampling into naturalistic, in-situ field settings — ethnographic sites, clinical environments, organizational contexts — where data collection and analysis proceed simultaneously. | Purposive sampling is a non-probability strategy in which the researcher deliberately selects participants, documents, or cases that are information-rich with respect to the research question. Rather than drawing units at random, the researcher applies explicit criteria aligned with the study's purpose, maximising the depth and relevance of the data collected. It is the default sampling logic in most qualitative research designs and is also used in mixed-methods and applied evaluative work. |
| ScholarGateDatasett ↗ |
|
|