Sammenlign metoder
Gjennomgå de valgte metodene side om side; rader som avviker, er uthevet.
| Feltbasert metaforanalyse× | Innholdsanalyse× | |
|---|---|---|
| Fagfelt | Kvalitativ | Kvalitativ |
| Familie | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Opprinnelsesår≠ | 1990s–2000s (field-based applications) | Systematised through Krippendorff's methodology work; 4th edition 2018 |
| Opphavsperson≠ | Rooted in Lakoff & Johnson (1980); field-based application developed across educational and social science research from the 1990s onward | Klaus Krippendorff (systematic formulation); roots in early 20th-century communications research |
| Type≠ | Qualitative analytic method | Qualitative / mixed-method research technique |
| Opprinnelig kilde≠ | Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors We Live By. University of Chicago Press. ISBN: 978-0226468013 | Krippendorff, K. (2018). Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology (4th ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-1506395661 |
| Alias≠ | field metaphor elicitation, naturalistic metaphor analysis, contextual metaphor analysis, FbMA | İçerik Analizi, systematic content coding, quantitative content analysis |
| Relaterte | 5 | 5 |
| Sammendrag≠ | Field-based metaphor analysis is a qualitative method that collects and interprets spontaneous or elicited metaphors from participants in their natural settings. Grounded in Lakoff and Johnson's conceptual metaphor theory, it reveals how individuals and communities structure abstract concepts — such as teaching, leadership, or illness — through figurative language encountered or produced in real contexts. Unlike purely document-based metaphor studies, field-based variants combine data collection in natural field settings with systematic analytic coding. | Content analysis is a systematic research technique for reducing text, visual, or media material into coded categories so that patterns can be counted, compared, and interpreted. Formalised by Klaus Krippendorff in his widely cited methodology textbook (latest edition 2018), the method sits at the boundary of qualitative and quantitative inquiry: it imposes structured, replicable coding on inherently meaning-laden material. |
| ScholarGateDatasett ↗ |
|
|