Sammenlign metoder

	Feminist Participatory Action Research	Intersectionality Analysis
Fagfelt	Gender Studies	Gender Studies
Familie	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline
Opprinnelsesår	1987	1989
Opphavsperson	Patricia Maguire; Colleen Reid and Wendy Frisby	Kimberlé Crenshaw
Type	Participatory, emancipatory feminist research methodology	Critical qualitative analytic framework
Opprinnelig kilde	Reid, C., & Frisby, W. (2008). Continuing the journey: Articulating dimensions of feminist participatory action research (FPAR). In P. Reason & H. Bradbury (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Action Research (2nd ed., pp. 93–105). SAGE, London. ISBN: 9781412920308	Crenshaw, K. (1991). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43(6), 1241–1299.
Alias	FPAR, Feminist PAR	Intersectional Analysis, Intersectionality Framework, Intersectional Qualitative Analysis
Relaterte	4	4
Sammendrag	Feminist Participatory Action Research (FPAR) fuses the participatory action research tradition — in which communities investigate their own conditions through cycles of action and reflection — with feminist commitments to analyzing gender power, foregrounding marginalized women's knowledge, practicing reflexivity, and producing concrete social change. Pioneered by Patricia Maguire in 1987 and later systematized by Colleen Reid and Wendy Frisby, it dissolves the usual divide between researcher and researched, positioning community members as co-researchers who shape the questions, the process, and the outcomes.	Intersectionality analysis is a critical qualitative framework that examines how multiple social categories — such as race, gender, class, sexuality, and disability — intersect and operate together to shape lived experience, advantage, and disadvantage. Coined by legal scholar Kimberlé Crenshaw in 1989 and 1991, it rejects single-axis analysis that treats categories one at a time, insisting instead that overlapping systems of power produce qualitatively distinct positions that cannot be understood by adding the categories separately.