ScholarGate
Assistent

Sammenlign metoder

Gjennomgå de valgte metodene side om side; rader som avviker, er uthevet.

Regnskapsføring av økologisk fotavtrykk×Materialstrømsanalyse (MFA)×
FagfeltBærekraftBærekraft
FamilieProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Opprinnelsesår19962004
OpphavspersonMathis Wackernagel & William ReesBrunner & Rechberger
TypeEnvironmental accounting indicatorQuantitative systems accounting method
Opprinnelig kildeWackernagel, M., & Rees, W. (1996). Our Ecological Footprint: Reducing Human Impact on the Earth. New Society Publishers. ISBN: 978-0-86571-312-3Brunner, P. H., & Rechberger, H. (2004). Practical Handbook of Material Flow Analysis. Lewis Publishers. ISBN: 978-1-56670-604-9
AliasEFA, Ecological Footprint Analysis, Biocapacity Accounting, Ekolojik Ayak İziSubstance Flow Analysis, Bulk-MFA, Material Flux Analysis, Malzeme Akış Analizi
Relaterte23
SammendragEcological Footprint Accounting (EFA) is a resource accounting framework that measures how much biologically productive land and water area a human population requires to produce the resources it consumes and to absorb the waste it generates. Introduced by Mathis Wackernagel and William Rees in 1996, it compares human demand on nature against Earth's regenerative capacity, expressed in standardized global hectares (gha).Material Flow Analysis (MFA) is a systematic method for quantifying the flows and stocks of materials within a defined system boundary over a specified time period. Introduced comprehensively by Paul H. Brunner and Helmut Rechberger in their 2004 handbook, MFA applies mass-balance principles to track how raw materials, products, wastes, and emissions move through industrial, urban, or national metabolisms, enabling evidence-based resource management and waste policy.
ScholarGateDatasett
  1. v1
  2. 1 Kilder
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 Kilder
  3. PUBLISHED

Gå til søk Last ned lysbilder

ScholarGateSammenlign metoder: Ecological Footprint · Material Flow Analysis. Hentet 2026-06-18 fra https://scholargate.app/no/compare