ScholarGate
Assistent

Sammenlign metoder

Gjennomgå de valgte metodene side om side; rader som avviker, er uthevet.

Definere sammenhenger mellom rangerte kriterier×Vurdering av additivt forhold×
FagfeltBeslutningstakingBeslutningstaking
FamilieMCDMMCDM
Opprinnelsesår20212010
OpphavspersonPamučar, D., Žižović, M., Marinković, D., Doljanica, D.Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z.
TypeRanked criteria interrelationship weighting (non-pairwise sequential)Additive utility ratio (optimal reference row)
Opprinnelig kildePamučar, D., Žižović, M., Marinković, D., Doljanica, D. (2021). Development of an alternative approach for the selection of suppliers under the conditions of fuzzy sets. Symmetry link ↗Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z. (2010). A new additive ratio assessment (ARAS) method in multicriteria decision-making. Technological and Economic Development of Economy link ↗
Alias
Relaterte88
SammendragDIBR (Defining Interrelationships Between Ranked criteria) is a weight subjective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Pamučar, D., Žižović, M., Marinković, D., Doljanica, D. in 2021. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.ARAS (Additive Ratio Assessment) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z. in 2010. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.
ScholarGateDatasett
  1. v1
  2. 1 Kilder
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 Kilder
  3. PUBLISHED

Gå til søk Last ned lysbilder

ScholarGateSammenlign metoder: DIBR · ARAS. Hentet 2026-06-17 fra https://scholargate.app/no/compare