ScholarGate
Assistent

Sammenlign metoder

Gjennomgå de valgte metodene side om side; rader som avviker, er uthevet.

Dual Hesitant Fuzzy-utvidelse av TOPSIS×CRiteria Importance Through Intercriteria Correlation×
FagfeltBeslutningstakingBeslutningstaking
FamilieMCDMMCDM
Opprinnelsesår20201995
OpphavspersonWang, R., Li, W., Zhang, T., Han, Q.Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L.
TypeDual Hesitant outranking/ranking — Dual Hesitant Fuzzy Element (DHFE: h(x) membership set, g(x) non-membership set)Statistical contrast intensity + correlation-based objective weighting
Opprinnelig kildeWang, R., Li, W., Zhang, T., Han, Q. (2020). New Distance Measures for Dual Hesitant Fuzzy Sets and Their Application to Multiple Attribute Decision Making. Symmetry DOI ↗Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L. (1995). Determining objective weights in multiple criteria problems: The CRITIC method. Computers & Operations Research DOI ↗
Alias
Relaterte88
SammendragDHF-TOPSIS (Dual Hesitant Fuzzy extension of TOPSIS) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Wang, R., Li, W., Zhang, T., Han, Q. in 2020. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.CRITIC (CRiteria Importance Through Intercriteria Correlation) is a weight objective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L. in 1995. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.
ScholarGateDatasett
  1. v1
  2. 1 Kilder
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 Kilder
  3. PUBLISHED

Gå til søk Last ned lysbilder

ScholarGateSammenlign metoder: DHF-TOPSIS · CRITIC. Hentet 2026-06-18 fra https://scholargate.app/no/compare