ScholarGate
Assistent

Sammenlign metoder

Gjennomgå de valgte metodene side om side; rader som avviker, er uthevet.

Modifisert TOPSIS basert på D-tall (Dengs evidens-teori)×CRiteria Importance Through Intercriteria Correlation×
FagfeltBeslutningstakingBeslutningstaking
FamilieMCDMMCDM
Opprinnelsesår20161995
OpphavspersonFei, L., Hu, Y., Xiao, F., Chen, L., Deng, Y.Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L.
TypeD-Number ranking — D:Ω→[0,1] with Σ_{B⊆Ω} D(B) ≤ 1; incomplete evidence allowed (Deng 2012)Statistical contrast intensity + correlation-based objective weighting
Opprinnelig kildeFei, L., Hu, Y., Xiao, F., Chen, L., Deng, Y. (2016). A Modified TOPSIS Method Based on D Numbers and Its Applications in Human Resources Selection. Mathematical Problems in Engineering link ↗Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L. (1995). Determining objective weights in multiple criteria problems: The CRITIC method. Computers & Operations Research DOI ↗
Alias
Relaterte88
SammendragD-TOPSIS (Modified TOPSIS based on D-Numbers (Deng Evidence Theory)) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Fei, L., Hu, Y., Xiao, F., Chen, L., Deng, Y. in 2016. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.CRITIC (CRiteria Importance Through Intercriteria Correlation) is a weight objective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L. in 1995. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.
ScholarGateDatasett
  1. v1
  2. 1 Kilder
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 Kilder
  3. PUBLISHED

Gå til søk Last ned lysbilder

ScholarGateSammenlign metoder: D-TOPSIS · CRITIC. Hentet 2026-06-18 fra https://scholargate.app/no/compare