Sammenlign metoder
Gjennomgå de valgte metodene side om side; rader som avviker, er uthevet.
| Modifisert TOPSIS basert på D-tall (Dengs evidens-teori)× | Analytic Hierarchy Process× | |
|---|---|---|
| Fagfelt | Beslutningstaking | Beslutningstaking |
| Familie | MCDM | MCDM |
| Opprinnelsesår≠ | 2016 | 1980 |
| Opphavsperson≠ | Fei, L., Hu, Y., Xiao, F., Chen, L., Deng, Y. | Saaty, T. L. |
| Type≠ | D-Number ranking — D:Ω→[0,1] with Σ_{B⊆Ω} D(B) ≤ 1; incomplete evidence allowed (Deng 2012) | Pairwise comparison (eigenvalue) |
| Opprinnelig kilde≠ | Fei, L., Hu, Y., Xiao, F., Chen, L., Deng, Y. (2016). A Modified TOPSIS Method Based on D Numbers and Its Applications in Human Resources Selection. Mathematical Problems in Engineering link ↗ | Saaty, T. L. (1980). The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation. McGraw-Hill, New York ISBN: 978-0070543713 |
| Alias | — | — |
| Relaterte | 8 | 8 |
| Sammendrag≠ | D-TOPSIS (Modified TOPSIS based on D-Numbers (Deng Evidence Theory)) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Fei, L., Hu, Y., Xiao, F., Chen, L., Deng, Y. in 2016. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. | AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process) is a weight subjective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Saaty, T. L. in 1980. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. |
| ScholarGateDatasett ↗ |
|
|