Sammenlign metoder
Gjennomgå de valgte metodene side om side; rader som avviker, er uthevet.
| Kompleks proporsjonal vurdering× | CRiteria Importance Through Intercriteria Correlation× | |
|---|---|---|
| Fagfelt | Beslutningstaking | Beslutningstaking |
| Familie | MCDM | MCDM |
| Opprinnelsesår≠ | 1996 | 1995 |
| Opphavsperson≠ | Zavadskas, E. K., Kaklauskas, A. | Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L. |
| Type≠ | Proportional assessment (benefit/cost split) | Statistical contrast intensity + correlation-based objective weighting |
| Opprinnelig kilde≠ | Zavadskas, E. K., Kaklauskas, A. (1996). Determination of an Efficient Contractor by Using the New Method of Multicriteria Assessment. International Symposium for The Organization and Management of Construction. Shaping Theory and Practice. Vol. 2: Managing the Construction Project and Managing Risk. CIB W 65 link ↗ | Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L. (1995). Determining objective weights in multiple criteria problems: The CRITIC method. Computers & Operations Research DOI ↗ |
| Alias | — | — |
| Relaterte | 8 | 8 |
| Sammendrag≠ | COPRAS (Complex Proportional Assessment) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Zavadskas, E. K., Kaklauskas, A. in 1996. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. | CRITIC (CRiteria Importance Through Intercriteria Correlation) is a weight objective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L. in 1995. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. |
| ScholarGateDatasett ↗ |
|
|