Sammenlign metoder
Gjennomgå de valgte metodene side om side; rader som avviker, er uthevet.
| Komparativ muntlig historie× | Komparativ narrativ forskning× | |
|---|---|---|
| Fagfelt | Kvalitativ | Kvalitativ |
| Familie | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Opprinnelsesår≠ | 1970s–1990s (oral history discipline; comparative application developed through 1990s) | 1990s–2000s |
| Opphavsperson≠ | Alessandro Portelli, Paul Thompson (oral history tradition); comparative design adapted from cross-cultural qualitative research | D. Jean Clandinin & F. Michael Connelly (narrative inquiry); comparative extension by the broader qualitative comparative tradition |
| Type | Qualitative comparative research design | Qualitative comparative research design |
| Opprinnelig kilde≠ | Portelli, A. (1991). The Death of Luigi Trastulli and Other Stories: Form and Meaning in Oral History. State University of New York Press. ISBN: 978-0791404997 | Clandinin, D. J., & Connelly, F. M. (2000). Narrative Inquiry: Experience and Story in Qualitative Research. Jossey-Bass. ISBN: 978-0787943523 |
| Alias | comparative oral history, cross-group oral history, comparative oral testimony, multi-site oral history | comparative narrative inquiry, cross-case narrative research, narrative comparison, comparative narrative analysis |
| Relaterte | 6 | 6 |
| Sammendrag≠ | Comparative oral history collects and systematically compares first-person spoken testimonies from two or more distinct groups, communities, or historical contexts. The method blends the interpretive depth of oral history — privileging personal memory and narrative — with the analytical logic of comparative design, enabling researchers to identify both shared patterns and meaningful differences across the groups under study. | Comparative narrative research is a qualitative design that collects personal stories or life accounts from two or more participants, groups, or contexts and systematically compares them to reveal patterns, contrasts, and contextual influences. Drawing on narrative inquiry's attention to experience-as-story, it adds a deliberate comparative logic to identify what is shared, what diverges, and why differences emerge across cases. |
| ScholarGateDatasett ↗ |
|
|