ScholarGate
Assistent

Sammenlign metoder

Gjennomgå de valgte metodene side om side; rader som avviker, er uthevet.

Vurdering av additivt forhold×Kriteriekorrelasjon og standardavvik objektiv vektlegging×
FagfeltBeslutningstakingBeslutningstaking
FamilieMCDMMCDM
Opprinnelsesår20102010
OpphavspersonZavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z.Wang, Y. M., Luo, Y.
TypeAdditive utility ratio (optimal reference row)Correlation-penalised standard-deviation weighting
Opprinnelig kildeZavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z. (2010). A new additive ratio assessment (ARAS) method in multicriteria decision-making. Technological and Economic Development of Economy link ↗Wang, Y. M., Luo, Y. (2010). Integration of correlations with standard deviations for determining attribute weights in multiple attribute decision making. Mathematical and Computer Modelling DOI ↗
Alias
Relaterte88
SammendragARAS (Additive Ratio Assessment) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z. in 2010. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.CCSD (Criteria Correlation and Standard Deviation objective weighting) is a weight objective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Wang, Y. M., Luo, Y. in 2010. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.
ScholarGateDatasett
  1. v1
  2. 1 Kilder
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 Kilder
  3. PUBLISHED

Gå til søk Download slides

ScholarGateSammenlign metoder: ARAS · CCSD. Hentet 2026-06-15 fra https://scholargate.app/no/compare