Sammenlign metoder
Gjennomgå de valgte metodene side om side; rader som avviker, er uthevet.
| Vurdering av additivt forhold× | Analytic Hierarchy Process× | |
|---|---|---|
| Fagfelt | Beslutningstaking | Beslutningstaking |
| Familie | MCDM | MCDM |
| Opprinnelsesår≠ | 2010 | 1980 |
| Opphavsperson≠ | Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z. | Saaty, T. L. |
| Type≠ | Additive utility ratio (optimal reference row) | Pairwise comparison (eigenvalue) |
| Opprinnelig kilde≠ | Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z. (2010). A new additive ratio assessment (ARAS) method in multicriteria decision-making. Technological and Economic Development of Economy link ↗ | Saaty, T. L. (1980). The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation. McGraw-Hill, New York ISBN: 978-0070543713 |
| Alias | — | — |
| Relaterte | 8 | 8 |
| Sammendrag≠ | ARAS (Additive Ratio Assessment) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z. in 2010. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. | AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process) is a weight subjective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Saaty, T. L. in 1980. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. |
| ScholarGateDatasett ↗ |
|
|