ScholarGate
Assistent

Sammenlign metoder

Gjennomgå de valgte metodene side om side; rader som avviker, er uthevet.

Adaptiv doseresponsanalyse×Evaluering av screeningtester×
FagfeltEpidemiologiEpidemiologi
FamilieProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Opprinnelsesår2000s (key papers 2005–2007; ICH E4 guidance 1994 for classical dose-response)1968 (Wilson-Jungner principles); statistical framework developed 1970s–2000s
OpphavspersonFrank Bretz, José Pinheiro and colleagues; foundational MCP-Mod frameworkWilson & Jungner (WHO criteria, 1968); foundational work by Pepe, Altman, and others in statistical test evaluation
TypeAdaptive statistical design and analysisObservational diagnostic / epidemiological evaluation design
Opprinnelig kildeBretz, F., Pinheiro, J. C., & Branson, M. (2005). Combining multiple comparisons and modeling techniques in dose-response studies. Biometrics, 61(3), 738-748. DOI ↗Wilson, J. M. G., & Jungner, G. (1968). Principles and Practice of Screening for Disease. World Health Organization. Public Health Papers No. 34. link ↗
Aliasadaptive DRA, adaptive dose-finding analysis, adaptive exposure-response analysis, adaptive D-R modelingscreening study, screening performance evaluation, screening accuracy assessment, STE
Relaterte66
SammendragAdaptive dose-response analysis combines pre-specified dose-response modeling with planned interim looks that allow modifications — such as dropping ineffective doses or reallocating sample size — while maintaining statistical integrity. The most widely cited framework is MCP-Mod (Multiple Comparisons and Modeling), endorsed by the EMA and FDA as a fit-for-purpose methodology for dose-finding studies in drug development.Screening test evaluation is a systematic epidemiological approach for assessing whether a test or program can accurately and cost-effectively identify individuals with a condition before symptoms appear. It quantifies diagnostic performance metrics — sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, and the ROC curve — and evaluates whether a screening program meets established public health criteria for adoption and harm-benefit balance.
ScholarGateDatasett
  1. v1
  2. 2 Kilder
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Kilder
  3. PUBLISHED

Gå til søk Last ned lysbilder

ScholarGateSammenlign metoder: Adaptive Dose-Response Analysis · Screening Test Evaluation. Hentet 2026-06-17 fra https://scholargate.app/no/compare