ScholarGate
Assistent
Process / pipelineTransport equity / accessibility evaluation

Accessibility Equity Analysis

Accessibility equity analysis asks not just how much access to opportunities a place has, but how that access is distributed across people and social groups — who can reach jobs, healthcare, and education, and who is left behind. It pairs an accessibility measure, in the tradition formalized by Karst Geurs and Bert van Wee, with the distributional tools of inequality measurement: Lorenz curves, Gini and Palma indices, and comparisons between advantaged and disadvantaged groups. The result reframes accessibility as a question of fairness, revealing whether a transport or land-use arrangement concentrates reachable opportunity among the already privileged or spreads it equitably.

Openen in MethodMindBinnenkortToepassen, vergelijken, advies krijgen
Tools & bronnen
Dia's downloaden
Leren & verkennen
VideoBinnenkort

Lees de volledige methode

Alleen voor leden

Log in met een gratis account om dit onderdeel te lezen.

Inloggen

Methodenkaart

De omgeving van verwante methoden — selecteer een knooppunt om te verkennen.

Bronnen

  1. Geurs, K. T., & van Wee, B. (2004). Accessibility evaluation of land-use and transport strategies: review and research directions. Journal of Transport Geography, 12(2), 127–140. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2003.10.005

Deze pagina citeren

ScholarGate. (2026, June 22). Accessibility Equity Analysis (Distributional Assessment of Access to Opportunities). ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/nl/urban-studies/accessibility-equity-analysis

Welke methode?

Plaats deze methode naast haar naaste verwanten en lees ze naast elkaar — de bibliotheek legt de boeken op tafel; de keuze is aan u.

Naast elkaar vergelijken

Geciteerd door

ScholarGateAccessibility Equity Analysis (Accessibility Equity Analysis (Distributional Assessment of Access to Opportunities)). Geraadpleegd op 2026-06-24 via https://scholargate.app/nl/urban-studies/accessibility-equity-analysis · Gegevensset: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20539026