Methodenbewijsdossier

Controversy Mapping

Controversy mapping is a descriptive method for exploring and representing socio-technical disputes while they are still open and unsettled, before they harden into accepted facts or stable technologies. Developed as a teaching practice by Bruno Latour and codified by Tommaso Venturini at the Sciences Po médialab, it asks the analyst to dive into the heat of a debate, follow the actors and their arguments without prematurely taking sides, and render the resulting complexity legible through maps and visualisations. It treats controversy not as a pathology to be resolved but as the privileged moment in which the social and the technical are visibly being assembled.

Sources recorded, not reviewed

Bronrecord

Citaten letterlijk overgenomen uit het bronrecord van de methode. Hieruit wordt geen verificatie op claimniveau afgeleid.

Controversy Mapping (Cartography of Scientific Controversies)

Taxonomisch methodendossier · process-pipeline / science-technology-studies

Volledige methode openen

Gecureerde claims

Claims opgeslagen in het bewijsregister, elk met zijn eigen beoordeling.

Nog geen gecureerde claims

Deze weergave verzint geen claimbeoordeling als het register er geen heeft.

Gerelateerde methoden

Gegenereerd uit de methodegraaf en getoond als machinaal voorgestelde relaties — er wordt geen bewijsclaim afgeleid.

Same method familyActor-Network Theory Analysismachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Same method familyBoundary-Work Analysismachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Same method familySocial Construction of Technologymachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Same method familySociotechnical Imaginaries Analysismachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.