ScholarGate
Assistent

Methoden vergelijken

Bekijk de geselecteerde methoden naast elkaar; rijen die verschillen zijn gemarkeerd.

Zivot-Andrews Structuurdoorbraaktest×Granger Causaliteitstest×
VakgebiedEconometrieEconometrie
FamilieRegression modelRegression model
Jaar van ontstaan19921969
GrondleggerEric Zivot and Donald W. K. AndrewsClive W. J. Granger
TypeUnit root test with endogenous structural breakCausality test (F-test on VAR)
Oorspronkelijke bronZivot, E., & Andrews, D. W. K. (1992). Further evidence on the great crash, the oil-price shock, and the unit-root hypothesis. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 10(3), 251–270. DOI ↗Granger, C. W. J. (1969). Investigating Causal Relations by Econometric Models and Cross-spectral Methods. Econometrica, 37(3), 424–438. DOI ↗
AliassenZA test, Zivot-Andrews unit root test, endogenous structural break unit root test, ZA structural break testGranger test, GC test, predictive causality test, Granger non-causality test
Verwant65
SamenvattingThe Zivot-Andrews (ZA) test is a unit root test that endogenously identifies the most likely location of a single structural break in a time series. Unlike the standard ADF test, it does not require the researcher to pre-specify when the break occurred, making it robust to data-driven regime shifts such as policy changes, financial crises, or major economic events.The Granger causality test is a statistical hypothesis test that determines whether past values of one time series help predict future values of another, beyond what that series' own past already explains. Introduced by Clive Granger in 1969, it is the standard approach for assessing predictive causality in VAR-based time-series analysis.
ScholarGateGegevensset
  1. v1
  2. 2 Bronnen
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Bronnen
  3. PUBLISHED

Naar zoeken Dia's downloaden

ScholarGateMethoden vergelijken: Zivot-Andrews Structural Break Test · Granger Causality Test. Geraadpleegd op 2026-06-17 via https://scholargate.app/nl/compare