ScholarGate
Assistent

Methoden vergelijken

Bekijk de geselecteerde methoden naast elkaar; rijen die verschillen zijn gemarkeerd.

Gewogen modulariteitsanalyse×Betweenness Centrality×
VakgebiedNetwerkanalyseNetwerkanalyse
FamilieMachine learningMachine learning
Jaar van ontstaan20041977
GrondleggerNewman, M. E. J.Freeman, L. C.
TypeCommunity structure optimization on weighted graphsCentrality measure
Oorspronkelijke bronNewman, M. E. J. (2004). Analysis of weighted networks. Physical Review E, 70(5), 056131. DOI ↗Freeman, L. C. (1977). A set of measures of centrality based on betweenness. Sociometry, 40(1), 35–41. DOI ↗
Aliassenweighted modularity, weighted Q optimization, weighted network community detection, strength-based modularityFreeman betweenness, BC, geodesic betweenness, shortest-path betweenness
Verwant56
SamenvattingWeighted modularity analysis extends the classical Newman-Girvan modularity measure to networks where edges carry numeric strengths (frequencies, intensities, costs). By replacing binary adjacency with tie weights, it finds community partitions that reflect how densely interconnected subgroups are relative to what is expected under a weighted null model, yielding more nuanced groupings than unweighted approaches on data where edge strength varies meaningfully.Betweenness centrality, formalized by Linton C. Freeman in 1977, measures how often a node lies on the shortest path connecting every other pair of nodes in a network. High-betweenness nodes act as bridges or brokers: removing them fragments the network into disconnected components more severely than removing any other nodes.
ScholarGateGegevensset
  1. v1
  2. 2 Bronnen
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Bronnen
  3. PUBLISHED

Naar zoeken Dia's downloaden

ScholarGateMethoden vergelijken: Weighted Modularity Analysis · Betweenness Centrality. Geraadpleegd op 2026-06-17 via https://scholargate.app/nl/compare