Methoden vergelijken
Bekijk de geselecteerde methoden naast elkaar; rijen die verschillen zijn gemarkeerd.
| Gewogen F1× | Macro-gemiddelde F1× | |
|---|---|---|
| Vakgebied | Modelevaluatie | Modelevaluatie |
| Familie | MCDM | MCDM |
| Jaar van ontstaan | 2000s | 2000s |
| Grondlegger | Multi-class evaluation community | Multi-class evaluation community |
| Type | Evaluation metric | Evaluation metric |
| Oorspronkelijke bron | Powers, D. M. (2011). Evaluation: From Precision, Recall and F-Measure to ROC, Informedness, Markedness and Correlation. Journal of Machine Learning Technologies, 2(1), 37-63. link ↗ | Powers, D. M. (2011). Evaluation: From Precision, Recall and F-Measure to ROC, Informedness, Markedness and Correlation. Journal of Machine Learning Technologies, 2(1), 37-63. link ↗ |
| Aliassen≠ | Support-weighted F1 | Macro F1, Unweighted average F1 |
| Verwant | 3 | 3 |
| Samenvatting≠ | Weighted F1 computes the F1-score for each class and then takes a weighted average, where weights are proportional to the number of samples in each class (support). It provides a middle ground between macro and micro-averaging. | Macro-averaged F1 computes the F1-score independently for each class and then takes the unweighted arithmetic mean. It treats all classes equally, regardless of their frequency in the dataset, making it useful for imbalanced multi-class problems. |
| ScholarGateGegevensset ↗ |
|
|