Methoden vergelijken

	Tijd-gesegmenteerde Mapping Review	Scoping Review
Vakgebied	Scientometrie	Scientometrie
Familie	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline
Jaar van ontstaan	2000s–2010s	2005
Grondlegger	Campbell Collaboration / Gough, Oliver & Thomas	Hilary Arksey & Lisa O'Malley
Type	Evidence synthesis with temporal segmentation	Evidence synthesis review design
Oorspronkelijke bron	Gough, D., Oliver, S., & Thomas, J. (2012). An Introduction to Systematic Reviews. Sage Publications. ISBN: 978-1849204842	Arksey, H., & O'Malley, L. (2005). Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8(1), 19–32.
Aliassen	temporal mapping review, time-period mapping review, longitudinal evidence map, chronological mapping review	scoping study, literature scoping, evidence mapping review, rapid evidence map
Verwant	6	6
Samenvatting	A time-sliced mapping review is a systematic evidence synthesis that partitions the search period into discrete temporal segments — such as five-year intervals — and constructs a separate evidence map for each slice. By comparing maps across periods, researchers can chart how topics emerge, peak, decline, or transform within a research field, producing a longitudinal picture of knowledge structure that a single-point mapping review cannot provide.	A scoping review is a systematic evidence-synthesis method that maps the breadth and nature of research on a topic — identifying key concepts, evidence types, and gaps — without necessarily appraising study quality or pooling effect sizes. Developed by Arksey and O'Malley (2005) and refined by Levac and colleagues (2010), it is particularly valuable for emerging or heterogeneous fields where a full systematic review would be premature or infeasible.