Methoden vergelijken
Bekijk de geselecteerde methoden naast elkaar; rijen die verschillen zijn gemarkeerd.
| Korte Nomologische Validiteit× | Discriminante Validiteit× | |
|---|---|---|
| Vakgebied | Psychometrie | Psychometrie |
| Familie | Latent structure | Latent structure |
| Jaar van ontstaan≠ | 1955 (concept); 2000 (short-form context) | 1959 |
| Grondlegger≠ | Cronbach & Meehl (nomological network concept); Smith et al. for short-form application | Donald T. Campbell and Donald W. Fiske |
| Type≠ | Validity assessment technique | Validity evidence / psychometric evaluation |
| Oorspronkelijke bron≠ | Cronbach, L. J. & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52(4), 281–302. DOI ↗ | Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56(2), 81–105. DOI ↗ |
| Aliassen | nomological validity of abbreviated scales, short-scale construct validity, nomological network validity, abbreviated form external validity | discriminant validity evidence, divergent validity, DV, AVE-based discriminant validity |
| Verwant≠ | 4 | 5 |
| Samenvatting≠ | Short form nomological validity examines whether an abbreviated version of a psychological scale preserves the pattern of theoretically expected correlations with conceptually related and unrelated constructs. It is a cornerstone step in justifying the use of a shortened instrument in research and applied settings. | Discriminant validity is evidence that a latent construct is empirically distinct from other constructs it should differ from. Originating in Campbell and Fiske's multitrait-multimethod framework (1959), it is a core component of construct validity and a mandatory check in scale development and structural equation modeling. |
| ScholarGateGegevensset ↗ |
|
|