Methoden vergelijken
Bekijk de geselecteerde methoden naast elkaar; rijen die verschillen zijn gemarkeerd.
| Short Form Generalizability Theory× | Short-Form Scale Development× | |
|---|---|---|
| Vakgebied | Psychometrie | Psychometrie |
| Familie | Latent structure | Latent structure |
| Jaar van ontstaan≠ | 1963–1972 (G-theory); short-form extension ongoing from 1980s | 1990s–2000s |
| Grondlegger≠ | Lee J. Cronbach, Goldine Gleser, Harinder Nanda, Nageswari Rajaratnam | Multiple contributors; foundational critique by Smith, McCarthy & Anderson (2000); practical guidance by Stanton et al. (2002) |
| Type≠ | Reliability / decision-study framework | Scale development methodology |
| Oorspronkelijke bron≠ | Brennan, R. L. (2001). Generalizability Theory. Springer. ISBN: 978-0387952826 | Stanton, J. M., Sinar, E. F., Balzer, W. K., & Smith, P. C. (2002). Issues and strategies for reducing the length of self-report scales. Personnel Psychology, 55(1), 167–194. DOI ↗ |
| Aliassen | G-theory for abbreviated scales, short-form G-study, abbreviated test generalizability, short-form D-study | scale abbreviation, abbreviated scale development, short-scale construction, item reduction methodology |
| Verwant | 5 | 5 |
| Samenvatting≠ | Short form generalizability theory applies the G-theory variance-component framework to abbreviated measurement instruments, using G-studies and D-studies to estimate how many items a short scale must retain to achieve a desired reliability and to evaluate the accuracy of decisions made with a condensed instrument. | Short-form scale development is the systematic process of reducing a full-length psychological scale to a smaller subset of items while preserving the construct validity, reliability, and measurement properties of the original instrument. It is widely used when administration burden must be minimised without sacrificing psychometric quality. |
| ScholarGateGegevensset ↗ |
|
|