Methoden vergelijken

	Short-form content validity	Short-Form Scale Development
Vakgebied	Psychometrie	Psychometrie
Familie	Latent structure	Latent structure
Jaar van ontstaan	1995–2000	1990s–2000s
Grondlegger	Messick (validity framework); Smith et al. (short-form standards)	Multiple contributors; foundational critique by Smith, McCarthy & Anderson (2000); practical guidance by Stanton et al. (2002)
Type	Validity evaluation	Scale development methodology
Oorspronkelijke bron	Smith, G. T., McCarthy, D. M., & Anderson, K. G. (2000). On the sins of short-form development. Psychological Assessment, 12(1), 102–111.	Stanton, J. M., Sinar, E. F., Balzer, W. K., & Smith, P. C. (2002). Issues and strategies for reducing the length of self-report scales. Personnel Psychology, 55(1), 167–194.
Aliassen	abbreviated scale content validity, short-scale content coverage, brief form content validity, content validity for short forms	scale abbreviation, abbreviated scale development, short-scale construction, item reduction methodology
Verwant	6	5
Samenvatting	Short-form content validity evaluates whether items retained in an abbreviated scale still adequately represent every substantive facet of the construct measured by the original full-length instrument. It ensures that shortening a scale does not hollow out the conceptual domain it was designed to cover.	Short-form scale development is the systematic process of reducing a full-length psychological scale to a smaller subset of items while preserving the construct validity, reliability, and measurement properties of the original instrument. It is widely used when administration burden must be minimised without sacrificing psychometric quality.