ScholarGate
Assistent

Methoden vergelijken

Bekijk de geselecteerde methoden naast elkaar; rijen die verschillen zijn gemarkeerd.

Self-Anchored Rating Scale×Single-System Design×
VakgebiedSocial WorkSocial Work
FamilieProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Jaar van ontstaan20092009
GrondleggerCodified in social-work practice evaluation by Bloom, Fischer & OrmeMartin Bloom, Joel Fischer & John G. Orme (codification in social work)
TypeIndividualized self-report rating scale with client-defined anchorsTime-series design for evaluating intervention with a single client system
Oorspronkelijke bronBloom, M., Fischer, J., & Orme, J. G. (2009). Evaluating Practice: Guidelines for the Accountable Professional (6th ed.). Pearson/Allyn & Bacon. ISBN: 9780205458066Bloom, M., Fischer, J., & Orme, J. G. (2009). Evaluating Practice: Guidelines for the Accountable Professional (6th ed.). Pearson/Allyn & Bacon. ISBN: 9780205458066
AliassenSARS, Self-Anchored Scale, Individualized Rating Scale, Client-Anchored ScaleSingle-Subject Design, Single-Case Design, N-of-1 Design, Single-System Evaluation
Verwant44
SamenvattingA self-anchored rating scale (SARS) is an individualized measurement tool in which a client rates a personally relevant target — a feeling, thought, or behavior that may not be captured by any standardized instrument — on a fixed numeric scale whose points the client and worker have anchored in advance with concrete, individually meaningful descriptions. Widely taught in social-work practice evaluation through Bloom, Fischer, and Orme's work, it lets a worker measure highly idiosyncratic internal states repeatedly and reliably, supplying the data for single-system designs when no off-the-shelf scale fits.A single-system design is a time-series approach to evaluating practice in which a single client system — an individual, family, group, or organization — is measured repeatedly on a clearly defined target before and during (and sometimes after) an intervention. By tracking the same system over time rather than comparing a treatment group to a control group, it lets a practitioner judge whether their own intervention is associated with change in the people they actually serve. It is the methodological backbone of the 'accountable professional' tradition codified by Bloom, Fischer, and Orme.
ScholarGateGegevensset
  1. v1
  2. 2 Bronnen
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Bronnen
  3. PUBLISHED

Naar zoeken Dia's downloaden

ScholarGateMethoden vergelijken: Self-Anchored Rating Scale · Single-System Design. Geraadpleegd op 2026-06-24 via https://scholargate.app/nl/compare