Methoden vergelijken

	SAPROF: Gestructureerde Beoordeling van Beschermende Factoren voor Geweldsrisico	SPJ-kader: Gestructureerd Professioneel Oordeel voor Risicobeoordeling
Vakgebied	Forensische psychologie	Forensische psychologie
Familie	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline
Jaar van ontstaan	2012	2003
Grondlegger	Vivienne de Vogel, Corine de Ruiter, Yvonne Bouman, Merike de Vries Robbé	Stephen D. Hart, Peter R. Kropp, David R. Laws
Type	Clinician-rated	Clinician-Synthesized
Oorspronkelijke bron	de Vogel, V., de Ruiter, C., Bouman, Y., & de Vries Robbé, M. (2012). SAPROF: Structured Assessment of Protective Factors for violence risk (Version 3). Forum Educatief.	Hart, S. D., Kropp, P. R., & Laws, D. R. (Eds.). (2003). Sexual deviance: Theory, assessment, and treatment. Guilford Press.
Aliassen	SAPROF, de Vogel SAPROF	SPJ, Structured Professional Judgment, SPJ Framework
Verwant	4	4
Samenvatting	The Structured Assessment of Protective Factors for Violence Risk (SAPROF) is a 17-item structured professional judgment tool developed by de Vogel, de Ruiter, Bouman, and colleagues (2012) to identify protective factors and strengths in individuals undergoing violence risk assessment. It complements risk assessment instruments (e.g., HCR-20v3) by systematically evaluating resilience, social support, motivation, and positive functioning—domains that mitigate violence risk and inform rehabilitation potential.	The Structured Professional Judgment (SPJ) framework represents a contemporary approach to forensic risk assessment that synthesizes clinical judgment with empirical evidence of risk factors. Rather than producing a numerical score, SPJ guides clinicians through systematic evaluation of case-specific evidence to arrive at a structured, transparent categorical risk judgment. SPJ has become the preferred methodology in many forensic settings globally and underlies instruments such as the HCR-20v3 (violence risk) and sexual offender assessment protocols.