ScholarGate
Assistent

Methoden vergelijken

Bekijk de geselecteerde methoden naast elkaar; rijen die verschillen zijn gemarkeerd.

Rough-TOPSIS×CRiteria Importance Through Intercriteria Correlation×
VakgebiedBesluitvormingBesluitvorming
FamilieMCDMMCDM
Jaar van ontstaan20131995
GrondleggerSong, W. Ming, X. Wu, Z.Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L.
TypeRough outranking/ranking — Rough number (lower approximation L, upper approximation U)Statistical contrast intensity + correlation-based objective weighting
Oorspronkelijke bronSong, W., Ming, X., Wu, Z. (2013). An integrated rough number-based approach to design concept evaluation under subjective environments. International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing DOI ↗Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L. (1995). Determining objective weights in multiple criteria problems: The CRITIC method. Computers & Operations Research DOI ↗
Aliassen
Verwant88
SamenvattingROUGH-TOPSIS (Rough-TOPSIS — Rough extension of TOPSIS) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Song, W. Ming, X. Wu, Z. in 2013. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.CRITIC (CRiteria Importance Through Intercriteria Correlation) is a weight objective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L. in 1995. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.
ScholarGateGegevensset
  1. v1
  2. 1 Bronnen
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 Bronnen
  3. PUBLISHED

Naar zoeken Dia's downloaden

ScholarGateMethoden vergelijken: ROUGH-TOPSIS · CRITIC. Geraadpleegd op 2026-06-18 via https://scholargate.app/nl/compare