Methoden vergelijken
Bekijk de geselecteerde methoden naast elkaar; rijen die verschillen zijn gemarkeerd.
| Rough-TOPSIS× | Analytic Hierarchy Process× | |
|---|---|---|
| Vakgebied | Besluitvorming | Besluitvorming |
| Familie | MCDM | MCDM |
| Jaar van ontstaan≠ | 2013 | 1980 |
| Grondlegger≠ | Song, W. Ming, X. Wu, Z. | Saaty, T. L. |
| Type≠ | Rough outranking/ranking — Rough number (lower approximation L, upper approximation U) | Pairwise comparison (eigenvalue) |
| Oorspronkelijke bron≠ | Song, W., Ming, X., Wu, Z. (2013). An integrated rough number-based approach to design concept evaluation under subjective environments. International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing DOI ↗ | Saaty, T. L. (1980). The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation. McGraw-Hill, New York ISBN: 978-0070543713 |
| Aliassen | — | — |
| Verwant | 8 | 8 |
| Samenvatting≠ | ROUGH-TOPSIS (Rough-TOPSIS — Rough extension of TOPSIS) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Song, W. Ming, X. Wu, Z. in 2013. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. | AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process) is a weight subjective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Saaty, T. L. in 1980. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. |
| ScholarGateGegevensset ↗ |
|
|