Methoden vergelijken
Bekijk de geselecteerde methoden naast elkaar; rijen die verschillen zijn gemarkeerd.
| Robuuste Wachtrijsimulatie× | Robuuste Discrete-Event Simulatie× | |
|---|---|---|
| Vakgebied | Simulatie | Simulatie |
| Familie | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Jaar van ontstaan≠ | 2000s–2018 | 1990s–2000s |
| Grondlegger≠ | Whitt, W. and colleagues; Bertsimas, D. and colleagues | Banks, Carson, Nelson, Nicol (canonical DES); robust extensions: operations research community |
| Type≠ | Simulation with worst-case uncertainty propagation | Simulation with robustness analysis |
| Oorspronkelijke bron≠ | Bertsimas, D., Natarajan, K., & Teo, C.-P. (2011). Distributionally robust optimization: A review. European Journal of Operational Research. link ↗ | Banks, J., Carson, J. S., Nelson, B. L., & Nicol, D. M. (2010). Discrete-Event System Simulation (5th ed.). Prentice Hall. ISBN: 9780136062127 |
| Aliassen | RQS, Distributionally Robust Queueing, Robust Queue Simulation, Uncertainty-Aware Queueing Simulation | Robust DES, Uncertainty-Aware DES, Robust DEVS, Resilient Discrete-Event Simulation |
| Verwant | 6 | 6 |
| Samenvatting≠ | Robust Queueing Simulation integrates robustness analysis into queueing system simulation by considering worst-case or uncertainty-set-driven scenarios for arrival rates, service distributions, and queue disciplines. It produces performance guarantees that hold across an entire family of plausible input distributions, making it essential for risk-sensitive service system design. | Robust Discrete-Event Simulation (Robust DES) is a simulation methodology that extends classical discrete-event simulation by explicitly incorporating uncertainty in model parameters — such as interarrival times, service durations, and resource capacities — and evaluating system performance across worst-case or distributional uncertainty sets rather than point estimates alone. It is widely applied in manufacturing, healthcare, logistics, and supply chain systems where parameter misspecification or real-world variability can lead to misleading simulation conclusions. |
| ScholarGateGegevensset ↗ |
|
|