ScholarGate
Assistent

Methoden vergelijken

Bekijk de geselecteerde methoden naast elkaar; rijen die verschillen zijn gemarkeerd.

Robuuste Propensity Score Matching×Propensity Score Matching×
VakgebiedCausale inferentieOnderzoeksstatistiek
FamilieRegression modelProcess / pipeline
Jaar van ontstaan2016 (robust variance correction); 1983 (PSM foundations)1983
GrondleggerAbadie & Imbens (2016) for matching-on-estimated-propensity-score with corrected variance; Rosenbaum & Rubin (1983) for PSM foundationsPaul Rosenbaum and Donald Rubin
TypeQuasi-experimental matching estimator with robust inferenceMethod
Oorspronkelijke bronAbadie, A., & Imbens, G. W. (2016). Matching on the Estimated Propensity Score. Econometrica, 84(2), 781-807. DOI ↗Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70(1), 41–55. DOI ↗
Aliassenrobust PSM, PSM with robust variance, bias-corrected PSM, matching with robust inferencePSM, propensity score weighting, covariate balance
Verwant63
SamenvattingRobust Propensity Score Matching (robust PSM) is a quasi-experimental causal inference method that pairs treated and control units on their estimated probability of receiving treatment (the propensity score), then estimates the average treatment effect using variance estimators that account for the uncertainty introduced by estimating the propensity score itself. The correction, developed by Abadie and Imbens (2016), prevents misleading inference that standard bootstrap or analytic formulas produce when applied naively after matching.Propensity score matching (PSM) is a method for reducing confounding bias in observational studies by balancing baseline characteristics between treatment groups, simulating randomization. Developed by Rosenbaum and Rubin (1983), it estimates the probability of receiving treatment given observed covariates, then matches or weights treated and control individuals with similar treatment probabilities. Widely used in medicine, epidemiology, and policy evaluation when randomized trials are infeasible or unethical, enabling estimation of treatment effects while controlling for selection bias.
ScholarGateGegevensset
  1. v1
  2. 2 Bronnen
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 Bronnen
  3. PUBLISHED

Naar zoeken Dia's downloaden

ScholarGateMethoden vergelijken: Robust Propensity Score Matching · Propensity Score Matching. Geraadpleegd op 2026-06-18 via https://scholargate.app/nl/compare